Officer testified that he smelled slight odor of fresh cannabis from inside vehicle stopped for cracked windshield, performed warrantless search, and located fresh cannabis in sealed bottle inside car, after K-9 sniff on exterior of car alerted. Officer's testimony was not so inherently implausible that court was obligated to reject. Olfactory evidence need not be treated as a form of scientific evidence subject to threshold determination of reliability. Thus, court improperly granted motion to suppress on grounds of lack of probable cause. (JORGENSEN and SPENCE, concurring.)
