Trial Practice from Voir Dire Through Post Trial

November 5, 2010
8:30 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.
7.00 MCLE hours, including 1.00 Professional Responsibility MCLE credit hours (PMCLE credit subject to approval)
Presented by Civil Practice and Procedure

Chicago
ISBA Regional Office
20 S. Clark St
Suite 900
(map and directions)

This program is designed to provide a practical and substantive review of the civil litigation process—from motions before trial to motions for a mistrial and motions for appeal. This presentation is directed toward civil law practitioners and designed for all levels of experience. Topics include motions in limine, voir dire, opening and closing statements, using technology to present your case, direct and cross examination, post-trial motions, and ethical considerations. A discussion on the things that lawyers, witnesses, and jurors do (or should not do) during trial is also included.
 
 
Program Coordinator/Moderator:
Robert H. Hanaford, Law Offices of Robert H. Hanaford, LLC, Chicago
 
 

Agenda

8:30 – 9:15 a.m. Motions before Trial
Requesting that certain evidence may (or may not) be introduced to the jury is an important pre-trial action in the civil practice process. This segment examines the effective use of motions in limine to shape the evidence before a trial begins.
Scott D. Lane, Lane & Lane, Chicago
 
9:15 – 10:00 a.m. Voir Dire
Finding or eliminating the right jurors is a necessary step in the trial process. This segment discusses voir dire and how to get the venire to talk about how they will decide your case.
Hon. Thomas M. Donnelly, Associate Judge, Circuit Court of Cook County, Chicago
 
10:00 – 10:15 a.m. Break (beverages provided)
 
10:15 – 11:00 a.m. Opening Statements: Setting the Stage for Success
In this session, the speaker examines the opening statement as a well-told short story and discusses the effective methods of communicating the theme of your case to the jury.
Robert J. Bingle, Corboy & Demetrio, Chicago
 
11:00 – 11:45 p.m. Presenting Evidence in the CSI Age
Using technology throughout a trial enhances a lawyer’s ability to deliver an effective presentation. This segment examines the effectual uses of technology when presenting trial testimony.
Karen A. Enright, Winters, Enright, Solzetta & O’Brien, Chicago
 
11:45 – 12:45 p.m. Lunch (on your own)
 
12:45 – 1:15 p.m. Presenting the Evidence: Direct Examination
In this segment, the speaker discusses the basic principles for preparing and presenting witness testimony, including expert testimony and impeachment.
Hon. Barbara L. Crowder, Associate Judge, Third Judicial Circuit, Edwardsville
 
1:15 – 1:45 p.m. Presenting the Evidence: Cross-Examination
This segment examines the basic principles of cross examination, including expert witnesses and the use of learned treatises.
Hon. Daniel T. Gillespie, Circuit Court of Cook County, Chicago
 
1:45 – 2:30 p.m. Closing Arguments: Effectively Pulling the Case Together
For this segment, the speaker discusses how to effectively combine the evidence and law into a powerful, concluding presentation.
Mark L. Karno, Mark L. Karno & Associates, Chicago
 
2:30 – 3:00 p.m. Tales from the Bench
This segment offers observations on trial practice as witnessed by a former seasoned State and Federal trial judge, and includes a discussion on the things that lawyers, witnesses, and jurors do (or should not do) during trial.
Hon. F. Keith Brown, Kane County Circuit Judge, 16th Judicial Circuit Court, Geneva
 
3:00 – 3:15 p.m. Break (refreshments provided)
 
3:15 – 4:00 p.m. Appellate Issues: What Appellate Court Wishes Trial Counsel Did!
This session discusses motions that arise during and after trial, such as motions for mistrial, motions to bar evidence, direct verdict, motion for a new trial and motions JNOV. Preserving issues for appeal are also examined.
Hon. Mary S. Schostok, Appellate Justice, State of Illinois Appellate Court, 2nd District, Elgin
 
4:00 – 5:00 p.m. Current Ethical and Disciplinary Issues*
This segment examines ethical and professional issues a lawyer must consider, including maintaining client funds, neglect of client matters, and mental health issues facing the legal profession.
James J. Grogan, Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission, Chicago
 
 
*Professional Responsibility MCLE credit subject to approval