ISBA E-Clips
December 6th, 2006 Edition

Illinois Cases

Ill App Ct - Civil - Abuse And Neglect/ Parental Rights / Jurisdiction
2nd Dist. In re Antwan L.

Ill App Ct - Civil - Administrative Review/ Police And Fire Boards
2nd Dist. Hammond v. The Firefighters Pension Fund of the City of Naperville

Ill App Ct - Civil - Appeals/ Public Utilities Act / Administrative review
2nd Dist. Strategic Energy v. ICC

Ill App Ct - Criminal - Reckless Homicide/ D U I / Sentencing
2nd Dist. People v. Gancarz

Ill App Ct - Criminal - Search And Seizure/ Arrest / U U W
2nd Dist. People v. Queen

Ill App Ct - Criminal - Search And Seizure/ Controlled Substance / Motion to suppress
2nd Dist. People v. Moorman

7th Circuit Cases
Civil - Insurance
Illinois School District Agency v. Pacific Insurance Company, Ltd., Nos. 04-4147 & 05-1471 Cons. (12/5/06). Appeal, C.D. Ill. Rev'd and rem'd.

Civil - Environmental Law
Environmental Law and Policy Center v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, No. 06-1442 (12/5/06). Appeal, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Aff'd.

Civil - Insurance
Lummis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., No. 06-1266 (12/5/06). Appeal, S.D. Ind., Indianapolis Div. Aff'd.

Criminal - Reasonable Doubt
U.S. v. Orozco-Vasquez, No. 05-3920 (12/5/06). Appeal, E.D. Wisc. Aff'd.

Criminal - Restitution
U.S. v. Fariduddin, No. 05-4381 (12/5/06). Appeal, E.D. Wisc. Aff'd.

Criminal - Sentencing
U.S. v. Gama-Gonzalez, No. 06-1965 (12/5/06). Appeal, W.D. Wisc. Aff'd.

Websites: Easy as 123.com

Legal News

Burger King Should Have Known: Suit
Mary Hutchison's family says Burger King put her in a dangerous situation, leading to her strangulation death in the Lindenhurst fast-food restaurant she managed. From the Chicago Sun-Times.

Central IL Judges Faces Misconduct Complaint
A central Illinois judge faces a judicial misconduct complaint for allegedly having inappropriate contact with two women involved in family court disputes he was overseeing. From the Bloomington Pantagraph.

Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Immigrant on Deportation Issue
The Supreme Court on Tuesday made it easier for some immigrants convicted of drug possession under state law to remain in the United States rather than being subject to deportation. From Law.com.

More Legal News

 
CLE
ISBA is an accredited CLE provider in Illinois.

Save the Dates for Law Ed
in Warmer Climes

Plan now to attend child support/family law CLE in Tucson on February 16 & 17, 2007. And, save the date for trial practice and DUI/traffic CLE in New Orleans set for May 4 & 5.

Find complete list at Law Ed CLE Calendar.

December 2006

CHICAGO
7 (Thursday)
Restoring the Balance: The Legal Community's Role in Restorative Justice
2.75 Professional Responsibility Credit hours

CHICAGO
December 8 (Friday)
Green - Surfing the Internet: A practical guide to the internet for environmental practitioners
2.0 MCLE hours*

CHICAGO
8 (Friday)
Family Law
2.0 MCLE hours*

CHICAGO
8 (Friday)
Eminent Domain
4.75 MCLE hours*

CHICAGO
8 (Friday)
Strategies for Achieving Diversity in Your Organization
1.5 MCLE hours*

CHICAGO
8 (Friday)
Illinois Supreme Court Review:
Recent cases, trends and practice before the court

2.75 MCLE hours*

Land American: We're the experts.



Today's Digests
Illinois Cases


Civil - Abuse And Neglect/ Parental Rights / Jurisdiction
2nd Dist.
In re Antwan L., No. 2-06-0425 (November 28, 2006) DeKalb County (BYRNE) Affirmed
Trial court had subject matter jurisdiction over parental rights of respondent, father, even though he was not served with notice by publication until 27 months after original petition alleging neglect was filed. Father submitted himself to personal jurisdiction of court by voluntarily appearing at termination hearing, thus waiving requirements of Section 2-16 of Juvenile Court Act. (Partially overruling In re Miracle C.)

Civil - Administrative Review/ Police And Fire Boards
2nd Dist.
Hammond v. The Firefighters Pension Fund of the City of Naperville, No. 2-06-0133 (November 29, 2006) DuPage County (O'MALLEY) Reversed in part, vacated in part, dismissed in part
Because service of initial memorandum of decision was not sufficient to trigger running of 35 day period for administrative review of decision by firemen's pension board to award plaintiff non line of duty disability pension, administrative review complaint filed after memorandum was served, but before service of formal decision, was premature; and trial court erred when it dismissed administrative review complaint filed within 35 days of formal decision. However, trial court correctly ruled that decision of board to deny line of duty pension is not clearly erroneous. Record supports conclusion that, although plaintiff may have suffered acute stress in certain occupational situations, the underlying causes of plaintiff's condition arose outside of and independent of, his duties as a firefighter paramedic.

Civil - Appeals/ Public Utilities Act / Administrative Review
2nd Dist.
Strategic Energy v. ICC, No. 2-05-0685 (November 29, 2006) I C C (KAPALA) Dismissed in part, reversed in part
Because utility, which applied for and was granted permission to operate as alternative retail electricity supplier (ARES) failed to exhaust its administrative remedy by failing to file motion to reconsider decision of Commission, its appeal from order allowing union to intervene must be dismissed. Further, appeal by union, which objected to utility's application, is well taken because utility failed to satisfy reciprocity requirement of Public Utilities Act.

Criminal - Reckless Homicide/ D U I / Sentencing
2nd Dist.
People v. Gancarz, No. 2-04-0190 (November 30, 2006) DuPage County (BYRNE) (O'MALLEY, dissent) Affirmed in part, vacated in part, remanded
Although evidence of cannabis in defendant's truck and bedroom was irrelevant, and trial court abused its discretion in admitting it, it was harmless error in bench trial. Further, testimony of physician, who extrapolated from blood and urine samples taken several hours after deadly accident, and concluded that defendant was under the influence of cannabis, coupled with testimony of defendant's specific acts of reckless driving, is sufficient to sustain conviction for reckless driving and aggravated DUI. However, trial court erred when it failed to give defendant the opportunity to be sentenced under amended reckless homicide statute. Since aggravated DUI conviction then becomes more serious offense, carrying a heavier sentencing range, the reckless homicide conviction merges into aggravated DUI, rather than converse, and 14 yr. sentence for reckless homicide is vacated. Court must re-sentence defendant within 1-12 yr. range of aggravated DUI conviction.

Criminal - Search And Seizure/ Arrest / U U W
2nd Dist.
People v. Queen, No. 2-05-0185 (November 28, 2006) Lake County (O'MALLEY) Affirmed
Even though defendant was seized when policeman ordered him to car, it was for community caretaking purpose, because defendant was drunk and had fallen from tree; and officer intended to drive defendant home for his own safety. Therefore, since officer was justified in calling defendant over to car and in conducting pat down search before transporting him, trial court properly refused to quash defendant's arrest or suppress switchblade seized from defendant's hand prior to trial for UUW.

Criminal - Search And Seizure/ Controlled Substance / Motion To Suppress
2nd Dist.
People v. Moorman, No. 2-04-1212 (November 29, 2006) DuPage County (GROMETER) (CALLUM, dissent) Affirmed
After defendant, who had just left apartment complex known for illegal drug activity, was stopped for expired registration, and he admitted that his license was revoked, police had probable cause to arrest him and conduct search of his person and vehicle incident to arrest. Therefore, even though police did not formally place defendant under arrest, they could properly inquire about presence of drugs in car and seize bag containing cocaine, which defendant's passenger pulled out of her mouth. Recovery of controlled substance, coupled with defendant's assertion that it belonged to him, was sufficient to convict him of possession.

7th Circuit Cases
Civil - Insurance
Illinois School District Agency v. Pacific Insurance Company, Ltd., Nos. 04-4147 & 05-1471 Cons. (12/5/06). Appeal, C.D. Ill. Rev'd and rem'd.
Dist. Ct. erred in granting defendant-insurance company's motion for summary judgment in action seeking declaration that defendant's errors and omissions policy required that it reimburse plaintiff-insured for costs associated with defending estoppel and waiver claims asserted by third-party against plaintiff when plaintiff initially agreed to defend third-party in underlying personal injury action, but then later refused to do so after concluding that policy it had with third-party did not cover disputed injury. While instant errors and omissions policy excluded coverage for contractual claims assumed by plaintiff, said exclusion was not applicable since estoppel and waiver claims were equitable in nature and were not based upon existence of any contract that plaintiff had with third-party.

Civil - Environmental Law
Environmental Law and Policy Center v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, No. 06-1442 (12/5/06). Appeal, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Aff'd.
Record contained sufficient evidence to support Nuclear Regulatory Commission's dismissal of plaintiffs' petition to intervene in Early Site Permit (ESP) proceedings after applicant submitted supplemental reports that evaluated alternative energy sources to applicant's request to build new nuclear power plant and after Atomic Safety Licensing Board determined that applicant's consideration of alternative energy sources satisfied requirements of National Environmental Policy Act. Bd.'s adoption of applicant's baseload energy generation goal as sufficient purpose behind ESP was not arbitrary or capricious, and Commission was not required to resolve "need for power" issue at ESP stage of proceedings.

Civil - Insurance
Lummis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., No. 06-1266 (12/5/06). Appeal, S.D. Ind., Indianapolis Div. Aff'd.
Dist. Ct. did not err in granting defendant-insurance company's motion for summary judgment in action alleging that defendant used bad faith in refusing to settle plaintiffs' insurance claim for fire damage done to plaintiffs' home. Plaintiffs could not establish bad-faith claim when at time of instant denial defendant was aware that: (1) plaintiffs were in financial distress at time of fire; (2) fire occurred on day after bank began foreclosure proceedings on plaintiffs' home; (3) plaintiffs purchased gasoline on day of fire; and (4) fire investigators concluded that fire was intentionally set and traces of gasoline were found at scene of fire.

Criminal - Reasonable Doubt
U.S. v. Orozco-Vasquez, No. 05-3920 (12/5/06). Appeal, E.D. Wisc. Aff'd.
Record contained sufficient evidence to support jury's guilty verdict on charge of possession with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine. Fact that police did not observe defendant actually possess cocaine when they entered defendant's home was not material since record established that defendant had constructive possession of three balls of cocaine that had been tossed from defendant's apartment at time of police entry.

Criminal - Restitution
U.S. v. Fariduddin, No. 05-4381 (12/5/06). Appeal, E.D. Wisc. Aff'd.
Defendant waived any entitlement to make installment payments on $384,000 restitution order when he pleaded guilty to underlying mail fraud and tax evasion charges and agreed to make said payment upon entry of judgment of conviction. Fact that Dist. Ct. set up payment schedule of $150 per month as part of terms of supervised release did not constitute contradictory sentence or set ceiling with respect to what defendant was required to pay in restitution.

Criminal - Sentencing
U.S. v. Gama-Gonzalez, No. 06-1965 (12/5/06). Appeal, W.D. Wisc. Aff'd.
Dist. Ct. did not err in sentencing defendant to 37-month term of incarceration on charge of illegal re-entry into U.S. by alien. Instant sentence was presumptively reasonable given that it was within applicable guidelines, and defendant was unable to show that instant sentence was unreasonable given defendant's past attempts to re-enter U.S. illegally.


To view this and other editions of E-clips on the web, visit www.isba.org/eclips/archives/.

Questions or comments? Please contact Jean Fenski at jfenski@isba.org or (800) 252-8908.

You have received this as a benefit of your membership in the Illinois State Bar Association.