Subject Index Driving Under the Influence

Reformers: trace law unfairly punishes drug users who are not DUI

By Janan Hanna
March
2014
LawPulse
, Page 114
Proponents are championing legislation to eliminate harsh penalties for drivers who had traces of illegal drugs in their system but were not driving while impaired.
3 comments (Most recent March 3, 2014)

Dramshop: Strict damage caps for the Illinois Insurance Guarantee Fund

By Adam W. Lasker
January
2014
LawPulse
, Page 10
Supreme Court resolves a split in appellate decisions to strictly cap the fund's liability, despite a harsh result for the parents in Rogers.

Tighter regulations for boating under the influence

October
2013
Illinois Law Update
, Page 504
Any person operating or having physical control of a motorboat in Illinois who has been involved in a personal injury or fatal boating accident shall now be presumed to have consented to a blood, breath, and urine test for the purposes of determining the content of alcohol or other drugs in the person's blood if arrested for a violation of the Boat Registration and Safety Act or similar provisions of local laws. 625 ILCS 45/5-16c new.

Refusal to honor POA for property; six-juror DUI trials.

September
2013
Column
, Page 483
What if the bank won't accept your client's valid POA for property? Might six jurors be better than 12 for your DUI trial? Here's what other lawyers think, based on Qs and As gleaned from ISBA discussion groups.

Vehicle seizures expanded to out-of-state drivers. PA 097-0984

July
2013
Illinois Law Update
, Page 336
Drivers with out-of-state licenses revoked or suspended for driving while intoxicated, hit and run, reckless homicide, or various other statutory suspensions are now subject to Illinois' provisions for seizure and forfeiture.

Recording police interrogations: bill would expand beyond homicide cases

By Adam W. Lasker
February
2013
LawPulse
, Page 66
Illinois was among the first states to require taped interrogations in homicide cases. Now it lags behind as other states pass broader laws. Proposed legislation would put Illinois back in the front ranks, proponents say.

Supreme court: ’reasonable suspicion’ enough for traffic stop

By Adam W. Lasker
October
2012
LawPulse
, Page 514
"Reasonable suspicion," not the more exacting "probable cause," is threshold requirement for an investigatory traffic stop, the Illinois Supreme Court held in a recent DUI ruling.

Uncounseled misdemeanor convictions can trigger felony DUI sentences

By Adam W. Lasker
July
2012
LawPulse
, Page 346
The Illinois Supreme Court ruled that prior misdemeanor DUI convictions – even if the defendant was unrepresented – can be used to bump a later DUI charge to a felony.

Missing Video Evidence in DUI Cases after People v. Kladis

By Thomas Kantas
May
2012
Article
, Page 250
In Kladis, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled that the state commits a discovery violation if it loses or destroy video evidence in a misdemeanor DUI case. Here's a look at this and related cases.
2 comments (Most recent May 2, 2012)

The bloody truth about DUI testing

By Helen W. Gunnarsson
October
2011
LawPulse
, Page 490
Just because the state has blood test results to use against your DUI client doesn't mean the case is over, a defense lawyer argues.

The Monitored Device Driving Permit: What Practitioners Need to Know

By Larry A. Davis
October
2011
Article
, Page 506
Illinois replaced the judicial driving permit with the monitored device driving permit ("MDDP"), which requires a large number of DUI offenders to use a breath interlock device. This article reviews the law and recent changes.
1 comment (Most recent October 11, 2011)

DUI Will Travel: When Drunk Driving Crosses State Lines

By Theodore J. Harvatin
August
2011
Article
, Page 406
What happens when an Illinoisan receives a DUI in another state or an out-of-stater is charged in Illinois? Here are the basics.
2 comments (Most recent September 2, 2011)

Increased fines for DUI offenders. PA 096-1342

August
2011
Illinois Law Update
, Page 388
The Illinois Vehicle Code has been amended to increase the fine for anyone who is found guilty of or pleads guilty to driving under the influence. 625 ILCS 5/11-501.01.

An aggravated DUI charge based on trace evidence of methamphetamine did not require the state to show that impairment was the proximate cause of the victims’ deaths

July
2011
Illinois Law Update
, Page 336
An appellate court erred when it reversed the conviction of a man convicted at trial of driving under the influence (DUI) even though there was no evidence of a casual link between impairment caused by a trace amount of methamphetamine and a car accident that killed two people. (See LawPulse in the June IBJ for more about Martin.)

Hutsell: Parents not liable for death of underage DUI driver

By Helen W. Gunnarsson
July
2011
LawPulse
, Page 330
The high court held that parents who hosted a party did not voluntarily undertake the duty to prevent underage drinking.

Trace amount of methamphetamine supports aggravated DUI conviction

By Helen W. Gunnarsson
June
2011
LawPulse
, Page 280
After People v Martin, the state need only prove that the driver who causes a fatal accident had methamphetamine in his system, not that it impaired his performance.
1 comment (Most recent May 27, 2011)

Change in Monitoring Device Driving Permit issuance procedure for DUI offenders. PA 096-1526

April
2011
Illinois Law Update
, Page 180
The Illinois Vehicle Code has been amended to modify the Monitoring Device Driving Permit (MDDP) issuance procedure for first offenders arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or other intoxicating compounds.

Defending a DUI client who said “no” to the police

By Helen W. Gunnarsson
April
2011
LawPulse
, Page 174
<

Law expanded for police to seize vehicles operated in violation of law. PA 096-1289

April
2011
Illinois Law Update
, Page 180
State lawmakers recently expanded offenses for which police may seize a vehicle. Vehicles, vessels, and aircrafts operated in Illinois are subject to seizure if the owner knows and consents to the use and that use violates certain laws. (720 ILCS 5/36-1).

Change to DUI law would limit court involvement in MDDP process

By Helen W. Gunnarsson
February
2011
LawPulse
, Page 66
No longer will a court hearing or order be required for issuing a monitoring device driving permit if a new bill is signed into law.
1 comment (Most recent February 22, 2011)

The preclusive effect of summary suspension hearings in subsequent adjudication

December
2010
Illinois Law Update
, Page 616
On September 23, 2010, the Supreme Court of Illinois held that the Circuit Court of Champaign County's finding of probable cause at the hearing on plaintiff's petition to rescind his statutory summary suspension, pursuant to 625 ILCS 5/2-118.1, did not bar the issue of probable cause from re-litigation in a civil suit for malicious prosecution.

Dramshop Act does not block respondeat superior claim for employee drunk driving

November
2010
Illinois Law Update
, Page 564
On August 18, 2010, the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, overturned a grant of summary judgment by the Circuit Court of Cook County, finding that the Dramshop Act does not preempt claims based on legal theories independent from the defendant's provision of alcohol.

Penalties stiffened for drunken supervisors of minors driving vehicles. PA 096-1237

November
2010
Illinois Law Update
, Page 564
Supervisors of minors driving with instruction permits are now subject to stricter penalties if they use alcohol or drugs while accompanying or instructing the minors. (625 ILCS 5/11-507)  

2010 Spring Session Roundup

By Jim Covington
August
2010
Column
, Page 404
A summary of key Illinois legislation passed this spring.

The legal significance of the difference between “in his breath” and “on his breath”

July
2010
Illinois Law Update
, Page 348
On April 16, 2010, the Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District, reversed a conviction for driving under the influence (DUI) by the Lee County Circuit Court holding that evidence was insufficient to establish that defendant had cannabis in his breath, blood or urine when he was driving.

Supreme court: HGN testing is good evidence, but not in this case

By Helen W. Gunnarsson
April
2010
LawPulse
, Page 174
In People v McKown, the high court rules that HGN tests meet the Frye standard - if they're administered properly.

Representing DUI Clients Before the Secretary of State

By Helen W. Gunnarsson
November
2009
Cover Story
, Page 556
A plain-language primer on the SOS process, including some unwritten rules about how to represent your DUI client.

U.S. Supreme Court: Confrontation Clause requires lab analysts to testify

By Helen W. Gunnarsson
October
2009
LawPulse
, Page 490
<

Demystifying Illinois DUI Sentencing

By Larry A. Davis
July
2009
Article
, Page 352
Presenting Illinois’ confusing DUI sentencing options as a chart enables practitioners to see at a glance which penalties their clients face.

Amendments to DUI statute should be harmonized

June
2009
Illinois Law Update
, Page 284
On March 27, 2009, the Illinois Appellate Court, Third District, reversed the decision of the Circuit Court of Henry County, which granted the defendants' motions to dismiss, holding that two subsections of the DUI statute enacted by PA 94-329 were not embodied in the DUI law, 625 ILCS 5/11-501 (2006), at the time the offenses were alleged to have been committed.

Select a Different Subject