DUI changes effective June 1By Helen W. GunnarssonJune 2008Lawpulse, Page 278Thanks to a law signed last year, a crazy quilt of DUI laws taking effect June 1 isn't so crazy. But ambiguities remain.
Verbal refusal does not control where defendant physically complies with chemical testMay 2008Illinois Law Update, Page 236On March 7, 2008, the Illinois Appellate Court, Second District, affirmed the judgment of the Circuit Court of De Kalb County finding that the defendant had not refused to submit to testing to determine the content of alcohol or other drugs in his blood.
Adult DUI offenders who transport minors - what is the law?By Helen W. GunnarssonFebruary 2008Lawpulse, Page 66A recent Journal article inspires a debate about whether the statute it discussed is still in effect and a call for the legislature to clear up the confusion.
How to Admit or Exclude PBT ResultsBy Eric R. WaltmireFebruary 2008Article, Page 92Police sometimes administer preliminary breath tests to drivers stopped on suspicion of DUI. When and how are the results admissible in a hearing? Here's a look at the cases.
Frye-ing the HGN testBy Helen W. GunnarssonNovember 2007Lawpulse, Page 570The Illinois Supreme Court rules that a Frye hearing must be held to decide whether the horizontal gaze nystagmus test reliably indicates alcohol impairment.
No Supervision for Adult DUI Offenders Who Transport Minors?By Ralph StrathmannNovember 2007Article, Page 596A statute requiring prison time instead of court supervision for adult first-time DUI offenders who were transporting minors conflicts with existing law, this author argues.
New DUI bill replaces JDPs with "monitoring device driving permits"By Helen W. GunnarssonAugust 2007Lawpulse, Page 398A major overhaul of DUI law doubles the summary-suspension period and requires offenders to submit to alcohol monitoring devices in return for driving permits. Critics charge that it will produce unintended consequences, including fewer guilty pleas.
Hearing to rescind a suspended driver's license must occur within 30 days of filingMarch 2007Illinois Law Update, Page 124On December 21, 2006, the Illinois Supreme Court reversed the decisions of the Illinois Appellate Court, Second District, and the Circuit Court of Kane County, and held the 30-day time limit within which a circuit court must hold a hearing on a petition to rescind the statutory suspension of a driver's license begins when the petition is filed with the circuit court, not when the state is served with the petition.
Bohner redux: insured properly denied coverage for "illegal" act, 7CA rulesBy Helen W. GunnarssonApril 2006Lawpulse, Page 166Like the Illinois Appellate Court, the federal seventh circuit ruled recently that an insurance company properly denied coverage to an under-the-influence driver based on the policy's exclusion for "illegal" acts.
Criminal-acts exclusion bars insurance recovery to DUI driverBy Helen W. GunnarssonMarch 2006Lawpulse, Page 110The court said a lesser traffic offense wouldn't trigger the auto-gap-policy exclusion. But will the ruling's logic be applied to other insurance policies with similar language?
Tough New Dui Laws Take Effect in '06By George A.M. HerouxDecember 2005Article, Page 636These new laws, effective January 1, take special aim at drivers responsible for fatalities.
No statutory right to refuse chemical testing for DUIMay 2005Illinois Law Update, Page 232On February 3, 2005, the Illinois Supreme Court reversed the decisions of both the appellate and circuit courts, which granted the defendant's motion to suppress the results of his blood and urine tests.
DUI: the acid-reflux defenseBy Helen W. GunnarssonNovember 2004Lawpulse, Page 562The high court holds that defendants with acid-reflux disease can raise it as a defense if it causes them to regurgitate during breath-alcohol testing.
"No" to compulsory DUI blood testsBy Helen W. GunnarssonApril 2004Lawpulse, Page 170A second district case holds that nonconsensual, non-treatment-related blood and urine tests are inadmissible in DUI trials.
Miranda, Fifth Amendment don't apply in summary-suspension hearingsBy Helen W. GunnarssonFebruary 2003Lawpulse, Page 58Three Illinois Appellate Court districts have ruled that summary-suspension hearings are civil proceedings to which Miranda and the privilege against self-incrimination do not apply.
New DUI, Traffic Laws Stiffen PenaltiesBy Larry A. DavisDecember 2001Article, Page 651Three new acts increase the penalty for driving while revoked and DUI offenses.