Publications

Section Newsletter Articles on Employment Law

Are flight attendants always traveling employees? By Richard D. Hannigan Workers' Compensation Law, April 2016 The appellate court answered this question earlier this year in United Airlines Inc. v. IWCC.
Establishing a duty of care in asbestos cases without occupational exposure By Cody Favilla Tort Law, April 2016 What is the duty of care owed by an employer to the household members of its employees?
Replacing American workers with foreign workers may be discrimination By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, April 2016 The INA’s anti-discrimination provision only prohibits intentional discrimination. This means that to engage in unlawful citizenship status discrimination, an employer must have acted “because of” citizenship or immigration status.
Use of third-party litigation exception to American Rule to recover attorney fees in enforcement of non-competition agreement By Richard A. Russo Labor and Employment Law, April 2016 Employers seeking to enforce a non-competition agreement may still be able to recover their attorney fees by pursuing a tortious interference claim against the third party employing the former employee in violation of the non-competition agreement.
Don’t go to federal court if you are claiming employment for sexual orientation By Kathryn E. Eisenhart Human Rights, March 2016 There are more protected categories under the Illinois Human Rights Act.
Employer not entitled to injunction against former employee By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, February 2016 An overview of the recent case of Capstone Financial Advisors Inc. v. Plywaczynski.
Staffing company may selectively use e-verify By Michael R. Lied International and Immigration Law, February 2016 An employer that selectively creates E-Verify cases for employees based on citizenship status or national origin may violate the INA's anti-discrimination provision.
Supreme Court rulings to watch By Carl R. Draper Labor and Employment Law, February 2016 The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in a couple of labor and employment cases that will be worth noting for all lawyers practicing employment law.
New limits on community college employment contracts By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, December 2015 The Public Community College Act was recently amended to impose certain limitations on employment contracts.
Protecting your employee handbooks and policies from attacks by the NLRB By Mark A. Spognardi Corporate Law Departments, December 2015 For almost a decade, the NLRB has devoted increasing attention to invalidating employer work rules which they deem to interfere with employees’ rights to organize.
Sometimes employer may lawfully ask for additional documents after internal I-9 audit By Michael R. Lied International and Immigration Law, December 2015 How to advise a client following an internal audit of the client’s Forms I-9.
Same-sex marriage ruling will impact employers By Ken Sachs, Megan Norris, and James Boufides Employee Benefits, October 2015 As a result of the ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, employers may want to change their policies to simply treat all married couples the same.
Illinois Human Rights Commission decision summary By Laura D. Mruk Labor and Employment Law, September 2015 A summary of the recent decision in Christopher Cross and Cook County, d/b/a Oak Forest Hospital of Cook County, Corporate Business Cards, Ltd. v. Illinois Human Rights Commission, Illinois Department of Human Rights, and William Kosmeija.
Independent truck driver vs. employee By Kenneth F. Werts Workers' Compensation Law, September 2015 An examination of Steel & Machinery Transport, Inc. v. Workers’ Compensation Commission.
When do you qualify as a traveling employee? By Robert J. Finley Workers' Compensation Law, September 2015 The traveling employee case generally presents an uncertain path to benefits due to the fact-specific nature of the inquiry.
Workplace wellness programs draw scrutiny from the EEOC By Michael K. Chropowicz and Ronald J. Passarelli Corporate Law Departments, May 2015 While the purported benefits to employers of maintaining wellness programs may be clear, uncertainty regarding the legality of such programs appears to be increasing.
An overview of Illinois’ pregnancy fairness laws By Justin L. Leinenweber Government Lawyers, April 2015 As of January 1, 2015, new provisions in Illinois law establish that pregnancy, childbirth, and medical conditions related to pregnancy or child birth are now protected under the Illinois Human Rights Act.
Case note: Whitaker v. Milwaukee County, Wisconsin By David Krchak Labor and Employment Law, March 2015 This opinion, decided November 25, 2014, establishes the law in the Seventh Circuit that at least for ADA discrimination claims, “joint employer” does not mean that under all circumstances two joint employers are both liable for any proven acts of discrimination under the statute.
Illinois Human Rights Commission decision summary By Laura D. Mruk Labor and Employment Law, March 2015 An update in the case of Corporate Business Cards, Ltd. v. Illinois Human Rights Commission, Illinois Department of Human Rights, and William Kosmieja.
Illinois regulates payroll cards By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, March 2015 An overview of the amendments to the Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act.
Regular attendance remains an essential job requirement notwithstanding employer’s work-at-home policy By Jon D. Hoag Labor and Employment Law, March 2015 The 7th Circuit’s recent decision in Taylor-Novotny v. Health Alliance Medical Plans, Inc. provides a reminder to all employers that in order for an employee to establish an ADA claim she must show that she is a “qualified individual with a disability.”
Workplace wellness programs draw scrutiny from the EEOC By Michael K. Chropowicz and Ronald J. Passarelli Labor and Employment Law, March 2015 While the purported benefits to employers of maintaining wellness programs may be clear, uncertainty regarding the legality of such programs appears to be increasing.
Employees failing to use employer’s recordkeeping system lose overtime claims By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, February 2015 Three recent cases make clear employees have an obligation to record their work time accurately.
Illinois Pregnancy Discrimination Law By Brian M. Dougherty Labor and Employment Law, February 2015 What employers need to know about this new law.
Two laws all employers must be aware of in 2015 By Laura D. Mruk Corporate Law Departments, February 2015 As of January 1, 2015, Illinois has enacted two new laws that impact most employers. 
A decision, finally, after nineteen years: Case review By Michael J. Maslanka Human Rights, January 2015 Although the order in this case was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23, it has a very interesting history and some good tips for employers. Unfortunately, it is also a sad commentary on the delay of justice in some cases.
Ban the Box Law will soon apply to small Chicago employers By E. Jason Tremblay Labor and Employment Law, December 2014 On November 5, 2014, the Chicago City Council approved an ordinance that effectively makes the recently-passed Illinois’ Job Opportunities for Qualified Applicants Act (commonly known as the Ban the Box Law) apply to Chicago employers with fewer than 15 employees.
Extended leave of absence is not a reasonable accommodation By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, December 2014 A summary of Hwang v. Kansas State University, ___ F.3d ___, 2014 WL 2212071(10th Cir. 2014),
Illinois Human Rights Commission decision summaries By Laura D. Mruk Labor and Employment Law, December 2014 Recent cases of interest to labor and employment law practitioners.
Employer may be liable for deaths after employee sent threats from company computer By Hon. Russell W. Hartigan and Jessica L. Fangman Civil Practice and Procedure, October 2014 On August 12, 2014 the Illinois Appellate Court, Fifth District, decided Regions Bank v. Joyce Meyer Ministries, Inc., finding an employer may be liable for the deaths of an employee’s wife and children, when death threats were sent by the employee to himself and his family using the employer’s computer network, and the employer voluntary undertook the responsibility to provide security and surveillance for their safety but failed to do so.