No discretionary immunity for retaliatory discharge of employeeJune 2008Illinois Law Update, Page 284On April 17, 2008, the Illinois Supreme Court reversed the circuit court's holding barring the plaintiff's retaliatory discharge claim against the Waukegan Park District due to the District's immunity under the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act (Tort Immunity Act), 745 ILCS 10/1-101 et seq.
The CFAA: New Remedies for Employee Computer AbuseBy Linda K. Stevens and Jesi J. CarlsonMarch 2008Article, Page 144The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act provides a path to federal court for employer-victims of computer abuse by employees and other insiders.
Departing Executives and the Wage Payment ActBy Richard L. Miller and John Haarlow Jr.March 2008Article, Page 138The Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act can be a powerful tool for departing executives who haven t been properly compensated.
Employers win pay-disparity case in Supreme CourtBy Helen W. GunnarssonAugust 2007Lawpulse, Page 398In Ledbetter, the Supreme Court rules that Title VII's filing deadline bars employment discrimination claims based on decisions that occurred outside the limitations period, even if the employee's current pay is lower because of the decisions.
Local public entity immune from retaliatory discharge claimAugust 2007Illinois Law Update, Page 404On June 6, 2007, the Illinois Appellate Court, Second District, affirmed the order of the Circuit Court of Lake County dismissing Gregory Smith's retaliatory discharge complaint against the Waukegan Park District.
Arbitration panel exceeded its authority by ignoring plain language of contractJune 2007Illinois Law Update, Page 292On March 29, 2007, the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, reversed the decision of the Circuit Court of Cook County confirming an arbitration award in favor of the plaintiffs on the plaintiffs' claim that defendants had improperly terminated their management agreement for several apartment complexes.
A new, stricter test for independent contractor status?By Helen W. GunnarssonMay 2007Lawpulse, Page 230Has the Illinois Supreme Court embraced a test that makes it harder for employers to classify workers as independent contractors rather than employees and thus avoid employee-related taxes and other expenses?
New rules for work-at-home solicitations - PA094-0999December 2006Illinois Law Update, Page 650The Illinois General Assembly has added Section 2XX to the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Act), adopting new rules to govern the solicitation of work-at-home employees. 815 ILCS 505/2XX.
No breach of fiduciary duty in planning a new, competing businessDecember 2006Illinois Law Update, Page 650On September 27, 2006, the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, upheld the Circuit Court of Cook County's findings that the appellees, Hallman and McQueen, did not violate their fiduciary duties as former employees of Cooper Linse Hallman Capitol Management, Inc (Cooper).