Relation-back doctrine not limited by dramshop act's statute of limitationsDecember 2011Illinois Law Update, Page 610A plaintiff is allowed to correct the mistaken identity of a defendant in a suit to establish liability under the Dramshop Act when the relation-back factors of state law are satisfied, according to the Appellate Court for the Fourth District of Illinois.
Substitution of Judge as of Right: When Is it Too Late?By Marie C. Fahnert and Tracey DanielsAugust 2010Article, Page 422Substituting a judge as of right - even fairly well into your case - is easier than you might think, and easier in some appellate districts than others. Here's a review.
Controlling Case Expenses: Lawyers' Duty to ClientsBy Robert L. Fogel, Michael S. Young, and Katie M. KingMay 2010Article, Page 244A look at the trial lawyer's fiduciary and ethical responsibility to disclose, monitor, and control reimbursable case expenses incurred on behalf of clients.
Federal standard timeBy Helen W. GunnarssonFebruary 2010Lawpulse, Page 66New laws standardize the way time periods are calculated in federal court.
The Overlooked Art of Redirect ExaminationBy Jeffrey J. Kroll and Patrick WhiteAugust 2009Article, Page 406Redirect examination is a powerful weapon for litigators, but it can backfire on those who forget its central purpose - to rehabilitate witnesses.
Making evidence meaningfulBy Helen W. GunnarssonJune 2009Lawpulse, Page 278A veteran lawyer and trial judge tells litigators how to present evidence in a way that engages and wins over jurors.
The importance of timely serviceBy Helen W. GunnarssonMarch 2009Lawpulse, Page 116Thanks to an amendment to supreme court rule 103(b), plaintiffs who haven’t been otherwise diligent in moving a case along must be especially diligent in obtaining service.
Code of Civil Procedure amended. PA 095-0831November 2008Illinois Law Update, Page 554The Illinois General Assembly has amended the Code of Civil Procedure by modifying several sections. 735 ILCS 5/3.
Trial-Practice Don'tsBy Matthew R. CrimminsJuly 2008Article, Page 360Don't promise the jury more than you can deliver, don't make inflammatory arguments, and more "don'ts" for litigation.
Is a motion a pleading?By Helen W. GunnarssonMay 2008Lawpulse, Page 230No, answers a chicago lawyer, and because of that a motion attacking another motion is improper.
Hudson, voluntary dismissal, and res judicataBy Helen W. GunnarssonApril 2008Lawpulse, Page 174Before you voluntarily dismiss after any decision on the merits, read the Illinois Supreme Court's recent Hudson ruling.
Lessons from Jury ResearchBy Sara Parikh and Terrence LavinApril 2008Article, Page 190Experience with mock juries challenges conventional wisdom about how jurors react to expert testimony and attorney performance.
Retooling the relation-back doctrineBy Helen W. GunnarssonApril 2008Lawpulse, Page 174The Illinois Supreme Court recently adopted the northern district's test for determining whether an amended complaint relates back to the original.
Denial of forum non conveniens constitutes errorMarch 2008Illinois Law Update, Page 124On December 26, 2007, the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, reversed the judgment of the Circuit Court of Cook County denying the defendant's motion to dismiss based upon interstate forum non conveniens.
No in personam jurisdiction over Indiana clinicMarch 2008Illinois Law Update, Page 124On December 28, 2007, the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, reversed the holding of the Circuit Court of Cook County denying the defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of in personam jurisdiction.
Refiled Claims: It's Notice, Not ServiceBy Professor Jeffrey A. ParnessMarch 2008Column, Page 152Voluntary dismissals need only be noticed to defendants in the second suit.
Time between voluntary dismissal and refiling does not affect reasonable diligence assessmentFebruary 2008Illinois Law Update, Page 72On December 13, 2007, the Illinois Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the appellate court and the Circuit Court of Knox County, holding the passage of time between a plaintiff's voluntary dismissal and refiling is not included in considering the plaintiff's diligence under Supreme Court Rule 103(b).
Three flavors of federal e-filingBy Helen W. GunnarssonDecember 2007Lawpulse, Page 622Effective last month, all three federal district courts accept electronically filed complaints – but each has different procedures.
Rule 216 requests to admit: no more "gotcha" gamesBy Helen W. GunnarssonNovember 2007Lawpulse, Page 570With its Vision Point ruling, the Illinois Supreme Court gives trial courts the power to allow late or otherwise deficient answers to Rule 216 requests to admit.
Sanctioning Firms for Frivolous FilingsBy Professor Jeffrey A. ParnessSeptember 2007Column, Page 490Courts should allow sanctions against firms for lawyers' misconduct.
An Update on Rule 213 Trial Witness DisclosureBy Daniel P. WurlSeptember 2007Article, Page 464A look at the evolution of the Rule 213 opinion-witness rule and the supreme and appellate court decisions interpreting it.