U.S. v. Sanders

In prosecution on felon in unlawful possession of firearm charge, Dist. Ct. did not commit reversible error in limiting defendant's proffered testimony regarding any inconsistency with respect to time and manner that defendant and others received Miranda warnings from arresting officers. While Dist. Ct. should have differentiated between defendant's proffer of extrinsic evidence and his attempt to cross-examine arresting officer, any error in limiting defendant in this area was harmless where evidence of officer's inconsistency regarding time and manner of Miranda warning did not relate to fact that defendant was found in possession of firearm on his person.