U.S. v. Olmeda-Garcia

Dist. Ct. did not err in sentencing defendant to 64-month term of incarceration on charge of illegal re-entry into U.S. even though defendant argued that Dist. Ct. failed to consider his argument that below guideline sentence was appropriate because similarly situated aliens in other Districts received lower sentences based on said courts' fast-track programs. Defendant failed to adequately develop said argument in Dist. Ct., and defendant otherwise failed to demonstrate that he would have been eligible for fast-track treatment in any District.