Meyers v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Dist. Ct. did not err in granting defendant's motion for summary judgment in FELA action after striking opinions of plaintiff's expert witnesses, who failed to comply with Rule 26(a)(2) of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by making opinions regarding causation of plaintiff's alleged work-related injury without setting forth any detailed support for how experts arrived at their opinions. Said conclusions as to causation failed to meet standards for disclosure under Rule 26(a)(2), and said Rule applied to opinions of instant experts, even though said experts were plaintiff's treating physicians, where said opinions as to causation of injury were not generated at time treatment was rendered.