The York Group, Inc. v. Wuxi Taihu Tractor Company, Ltd.

Dist. Ct. did not err in denying witness’ motion under Rule 60(b) seeking to vacate earlier order finding that witness was in civil contempt for failing to abide by subpoena directing witness to provide testimony in underlying civil action even though witness claimed that he had never been properly served with copy of subpoena. Dist. Ct. could properly credit process server and neighbor to find that process server left copy of subpoena inside enclosed pouch at side door of witness’ residence while witness was at home and refusing to open door. Fact that subpoena was addressed to witness’ business and in care of witness, rather than to witness personally, did not invalidate subpoena where witness’s business was in form of proprietorship.