U.S. v. Dong

Dist. Ct. did not err in directing defendant to pay $337,250 in restitution arising out of defendant’s guilty plea to bank fraud charge stemming from defendant's attempt to obtain multiple HELOC loans from applications containing false information about circumstances of loan requests. While defendant argued that restitution order was based on finding of relevant conduct to which he had not pleaded guilty, record showed that said order was based on conduct included in defendant’s plea declaration that resulted in actual loss to bank from sale of subject property that was less than amount of mortgage given to defendant on said property.