U.S. v. Bey

Dist. Ct. did not err in sentencing defendant to 92-month term of incarceration on bank robbery charges. Fact that defendant had never entered bank or participated in getaway did not require different result because defendant had admitted to having conspired to commit bank robbery, and thus was liable for crimes committed by those who had entered bank. Moreover, Dist. Ct. did not err in rejecting defendant’s claim that he was entitled to minor-participant reduction in guideline range, where Dist. Ct. noted that defendant recruited third-party and supplied third-party with pellet gun that third-party used in robbery.