Bankruptcy Ct. did not abuse its discretion in denying creditor/employee’s 2013 motion to reopen debtor/employer’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding that had been closed in 2009 so that creditor could pursue his 2004 California state-court discrimination claim against debtor that had been transferred to Bankruptcy Ct. prior to said closing. Instant three-plus year delay in seeking reopening justified denial of creditor’s request. Moreover, fact that Bankruptcy Ct. failed to timely docket creditor’s discrimination claim while bankruptcy proceeding was still open did not require different result, where creditor’s counsel had ample opportunity to bring such error to Bankruptcy Ct.'s attention. Also, creditor could not rely on alleged misstatement from debtor’s counsel that portion of creditor’s claim had already been paid to justify instant delay, where creditor would have known one way or another whether his claim had been paid.