Dist. Ct. did not err in sentencing defendant to below-guidelines, 40-month term of incarceration on drug conspiracy and distribution charges, based in part on finding that defendant qualified for two-level enhancement under section 2D1.1(b)(2) of USSG for maintaining premises for purpose of distributing controlled substances. Ct. rejected defendant’s claim that enhancement was inappropriate because storage of drugs was not primary purpose of his residence, where court found that “premises” for purpose of instant enhancement can have more than one primary use. Moreover, instant enhancement was appropriate where: (1) use of defendant’s home to distribute drugs was integral to drug conspiracy; (2) defendant was paid large sum to receive and store large quantities of drugs; and (3) defendant controlled access to said drugs. Moreover, any error was harmless, where Dist. Ct. indicated that it would have given same sentence with or without enhancement.