Dist. Ct. did not err in denying defendant’s request for reduction of his 91-month term of incarceration on charge of conspiracy to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine and heroin, even though basis for said request was adoption of retroactive sentencing guideline (Amendment 782) that reduced applicable guideline range for defendant’s offense. Instant sentence was below retroactively-reduced guideline range, and Dist. Ct. had correctly anticipated potential for instant reduced guideline range and indicated at original sentencing hearing that it would still impose instant sentence. Ct. rejected defendant’s contention that Dist. Ct. had failed to fully comply with two-step process for considering requests for reduction of sentences under 18 USC 3582(c)(2) as set forth in Dillon, 560 US 817.