Dist. Ct. erred in finding as unconstitutional Wisconsin statute that required plaintiff to wear GPS monitoring ankle bracelet upon his release from civil commitment that was imposed after completion of his sentences on two sexual assault of child convictions. While Dist. Ct. found that statute, which subjected plaintiff to 24-hour monitoring, violated 4th Amendment as unreasonable invasion of plaintiff’s privacy, Ct. of Appeals found that instant monitoring of plaintiff was reasonable, where expert indicated that plaintiff had between 8 and 16 percent chance of committing another sexual assault of child, and where plaintiff was pedophile who was predisposed to committing sexually violent acts. Fact that plaintiff was no longer on any form of probation or supervised release at time ankle bracelet was attached, or that he was 73 years old did not render instant monitoring unreasonable. Moreover, fact that public could occasionally view plaintiff wearing ankle bracelet constituted only slight increase in loss of plaintiff’s privacy, which otherwise had been appropriately curtailed as result of his convictions. Ct. also rejected plaintiff’s claim that statute, which was enacted after he had been civilly committed, violated ex post facto clause, where Ct. found that statute did not impose “punishment” on plaintiff.