U.S. v. Raney

Dist. Ct. did not err in imposing new, two-year term of supervised release as part of his sentence, after Dist. Ct. had found that defendant violated various terms of his original supervised release. Dist. Ct. provided adequate explanation for need for second term of supervised release, where Dist. Ct. noted heinous nature of defendant’s original transportation of minor for purposes of engaging in sexual act and attempted manufacture of child pornography convictions, as well as need for deterrence and need to provide for defendant’s rehabilitation. Moreover, defendant had waived any challenge to specific term of said supervised release, where defendant had failed to raise objection to said term in Dist. Ct. when given opportunity to do so.