Dist.Ct. did not err in granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment in plaintiff’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) claim, alleging that defendants failed to comply with dictates of FOIA, where plaintiff sought documents related to pre-market approval process for certain glucose monitoring system, even though defendant-agency had eventually supplied plaintiff with 8,000 pages of documents. Dist.Ct. could properly dismiss two of defendant’s employees as defendants in instant action, since section 552(a)(4)(B) precludes only “agency” from withholding agency records. Also, Dist. Ct. could stay discovery for purpose of setting briefing schedule for any summary judgment motion, where stay was consistent with speedy and inexpensive resolution of case. Moreover, record supported Dist. Ct.’s finding that defendant-agency conducted adequate search for relevant records, where: (1) defendant-agency supplied detailed affidavits describing its search process; and (2) plaintiff did not point to specific claims of exemptions with which he disagreed. Too, Dist. Ct. did not clearly err in determining that claimed exemptions were valid.
