U.S. v. Greco

Dist. Ct. had jurisdiction to revoke defendant’s first term of supervised release and to impose new term of imprisonment followed by new term of supervised release, even though said revocation occurred seven months following expiration of his first term of supervised release. Record showed that warrant for defendant’s arrest on violation of supervised release was issued one month prior to expiration of first term of supervised release, and warrant otherwise was supported by probable cause, where issuing judge was aware that defendant had been arrested for violating protective order, which established violation of his first term of supervised release. However, remand was required with respect to two conditions of defendant’s second term of supervised release, where Dist. Ct.: (1) was vague about requiring defendant to notify third-parties regarding unidentified risks it finds he might pose to third-parties; and (2) failed to explain why defendant could not contact four individuals who were not subject of protective order.