Dist.Ct. did not err in granting defendant’s Rule 12(c) motion for judgment on pleadings in plaintiff’s action alleging that defendant’s request for attorneys’ fees in state-court action violated Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) on ground that request for attorneys’ fees constituted unfair debt collection practice. Dist.Ct. could properly find that request for attorneys’ fees was not “debt” as defined under FDCPA, where said request did not arise out of any consensual consumer transaction as defined under FDCPA, but rather arose out of plaintiff’s alleged wrongdoings as condominium association board member at issue in underlying state-court action. Fact that plaintiff had purchased condominium that allowed him to be on condominium association board did not require different result, since fee request was based on his actions as board member and not purchase of his condominium.
