U.S. v. Muhammad

Dist. Ct. did not commit plain error in imposing $10,421.66 restitution order on remand, even though said order did not credit defendant $433.32 that defendant had previously paid on initial restitution order. Defendant failed to raise issue at remand sentencing hearing, and record showed that all parties agreed that defendant should be credited for said amount. As such, Ct. of Appeals was confident under instant plain error standard that defendant will be credited with said amount, such that defendant’s request for limited remand to generate new restitution order was not necessary.