The Reserve at Woodstock v. The City of Woodstock 

Plaintiff submitted plat to develop 10 acres of property per annexation agreement. City denied plat and rezoned and disconnected the property. Plaintiff then filed suit against City. Court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff on two counts. Court properly entered judgment in Plaintiff's favor as to three other counts, as Plaintiff had acquired a vested right in the approval of its plat under prior zoning ordinance. City's actions of rezoning and disconnecting property violated its duty of good faith and fair dealing, as a matter of law. (JORGENSEN and McLAREN, concurring.)