People v. Phillips

Defendant was convicted of DUI. State presented sufficient evidence from a credible police officer that Defendant emitted a strong odor of alcohol, exhibited slightly slurred speech, had bloodshot eyes, and performed poorly on field-sobriety tests. Appellate court declines to reweigh evidence against Defendant; weaknesses in evidence noted by Defendant do not lead appellate court to conclude that evidence of guilt was so unreasonable, improbable, or unsatisfactory as to justify a reasonable doubt of Defendant's guilt. (NEVILLE and SIMON, concurring.)