Ammar v. Schiller, DuCanto & Fleck, LLP

Court properly dismissed with prejudice pro se Plaintiff’s 4^th amended complaint against his ex-wife, Ameritrade, and the attorneys and law firms that had represented Plaintiff or his ex-wife during dissolution proceedings. Appeal, which is Plaintiff’s 3^rd appeal, dismissed because Plaintiff’s opening brief contains multiple violations of Supreme Court Rules 341 and 342, as did his 2 prior appeals. Violations include citations to volumes of record that are not part of record on appeal, appendix lacks table of contents and notice of appeal, and facts stated lack citation to record. (REYES and ROCHFORD, concurring.)