People v. Barajas

Defendant was convicted of traffic offenses and sentenced to pay more than $2,000 in fines. Court considered Defendant's inability to pay and the amount of payments that Defendant had made in each case. Court erroneously expanded the good cause standard beyond inability to pay or hardship to include prior diligence as shown by portion of fines he had or had not previously paid. Remanded for court to consider only Defendant's allegations and evidence of inability to pay or hardship to determine if good cause to revoke fines. (McDADE, concurring; WRIGHT, dissenting.)