Defendant was convicted, after jury trial, of delivery of a controlled substance. Once the defendant waived his right to counsel, court properly honored his right to proceed pro se; court told Defendant that it was his choice whether to do so or not and explained importance of being represented by counsel. Court never communicated to Defendant that he had a right to new counsel be appointed specifically to represent him during the Krankel hearing. This failure to provide Defendant with information and opportunity deprived Defendant of an important right and was an abuse of discretion resulting in error. Prosecutor's remarks in closing argument did not improperly bolster police officers' testimony because of their status as police officers.(MIKVA and CONNORS, concurring.)
Illinois Appellate Court
Criminal Court
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel