People v. Masterson 

Defendant, having confessed to history of pedophilic behavior, was involuntarily committed as a sexually dangerous person. Persons subject to the Sexually Dangerous Persons Act and the Sexually Violent Persons Act are not similarly situated. Thus, Defendant's equal protection claim, that he was not allowed to retain his own expert at public expense, as is allowed for those found to be sexually violent, must fail. (FREEMAN, THOMAS, GARMAN, KARMEIER, BURKE, and THEIS, concurring.)