Racial and Ethnic Minorities and the Law Newsletter
The newsletter of the ISBA’s Standing Committee on Racial and Ethnic Minorities and the Law

October 2013, vol. 24, no. 1

Have you written for us? Check out our new author index! Link to your personal listing from your firm's Web site—no ISBA password required. And contact Katie Underwood for FREE PDF copies of your article(s) that you can post or distribute however you'd like!

In This Issue…

  • Chair’s column
    A message from Committee Chair Jameika Mangum.
  • One of one
    Author Arthur Mingo discusses his experiences as the only African-American in the class of 2014 at SIU School of Law.
  • Ramadan
    An overview of the Muslim holiday to help legal professionals prepare for meetings with Muslim clients and employees.

Upcoming CLE

How To Not Throw Away Your Shot at Appeal: Protecting and Preserving the Record for Review
May 19 - Online Course

5th Annual Minority Bar CLE Conference
June 22–23 - Chicago

Full CLE Calendar…

Related Court Cases

Prisoners
Diggs v. Ghosh

Dist. Ct. erred in granting defendants-prison doctors’ motion for summary judgment in plaintiff-prisoner’s section 1983 action alleging that defendants were deliberately indifferent to his full tear in anterior cruciate ligament in his knee, under circumstances where said tear had been diagnosed in 2009, and where plaintiff was still waiting for surgery on said knee in 2014, when he filed instant lawsuit. While Dist. Ct. found that defendants’ prescribed treatment calling for pain medication, some physical therapy and various permits to alleviate stress to knee was adequate, Dist. Ct. ignored key evidence that would allow jury to find that defendants: (1) failed to follow outside medical advice on treatment for plaintiff’s knee and did nothing to assist plaintiff after noting that his knee condition had regressed; (2) ignored plaintiff’s claims that he had been approved for surgery; and (3) either failed to recommend any treatment for plaintiff or ignored plaintiff’s condition for long periods of time. Dist. Ct. also erred in granting defendant-warden’s summary judgment motion where plaintiff claimed that warden repeatedly took no action on plaintiff’s complaints concerning his knee.

Disclaimer: This newsletter is for subscribers’ personal use only; redistribution is prohibited. Copyright Illinois State Bar Association. Statements or expressions of opinion appearing herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Association or Editors, and likewise the publication of any advertisement is not to be construed as an endorsement of the product or service offered unless it is specifically stated in the ad that there is such approval or endorsement.