Author Index Gino L. DiVito

What I Learned From Teaching Trial Advocacy: The Closing Argument

By Gino L. DiVito
February
2024
Article
, Page 36
Part Five of a five-part series.

What I Learned From Teaching Trial Advocacy: The Cross-Examination

By Gino L. DiVito
January
2024
Article
, Page 28
Part Four of a five-part series.

What I Learned From Teaching Trial Advocacy: The Direct Examination

By Gino L. DiVito
December
2023
Article
, Page 28
Part Three of our five-part series, which focuses on tips and pointers for direct examination.

What I Learned From Teaching Trial Advocacy

By Gino L. DiVito
November
2023
Article
, Page 28
Part Two of a five-part series. The essential elements of persuasion: What to do and how and why to do it.

What I Learned From Teaching Trial Advocacy: Opening Statements and Storytelling

By Gino L. DiVito
October
2023
Article
, Page 28
Part One of a five-part series.

In Defense of Rejected Proposals

By Gino L. DiVito
June
2023
Article
, Page 40
A former member of the Illinois Supreme Court Committee on Illinois Evidence reviews its 2013 proposals for rules of evidence not adopted by the Supreme Court.

The Surprising Number of Differences Between the Federal and Illinois Rules of Evidence

By Gino L. DiVito
January
2020
Article
, Page 30
The Federal and Illinois Rules of Evidence diverge in dozens of ways worth noting.

New Limits on Subject Matter Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege

By Hon. Gino L. DiVito, Brian C. Haussmann, & John M. Fitzgerald
July
2013
Article
, Page 348
Illinois Rule of Evidence 502 and the Center Partners decision mean fewer business discussions fall outside attorney-client privilege.

Surviving the Death of Oral Argument

By Gino L. DiVito
April
2011
Article
, Page 188
A retired appellate justice offers his view of what can be done to assure full and fair vetting of cases in a post-oral-argument world.

Judicial Selection in Illinois: A Third Way

By Gino L. DiVito
December
2010
Article
, Page 624
Judicial elections? Merit selection? While the decades-old debate continues, a former judge proposes a constitutional amendment that represents a third way.

Select a Different Author