U.S. v. Figueroa

Dist. Ct. did not err in applying enhancement under section 3B1.1 of USSG when sentencing defendant on drug charges, after finding that defendant supervised at least one individual in drug operation involving four individuals. While defendant argued that enhancement was not warranted because he was only implementing decisions made by another individual, record supported imposition of instant enhancement where defendant acted as supervisor by telling third-party where to obtain and to deliver drugs on behalf of drug operation. Fact that some directives could have come from another individual did not preclude defendant from playing either manager or supervisory role in drug operation.