U.S. v. Kieffer

Dist. Ct. erred in imposing $31,845 restitution order on defendant’s bank robbery convictions, where $21,230 of said restitution order was based on four uncharged bank robberies that defendant had admitted to doing, since restitution statutes authorize restitution only for victims of charged offenses. Ct. rejected govt. claim that Dist. Ct. could impose such restitution as term of supervised release.