Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Insurance
Court found that homeowners' insurer had duty to defendant insureds in underlying lawsuit alleging insureds committed battery against Plaintiff after Plaintiff entered insured's property to retrieve baseball accidentally hit onto insured's property by Plaintiff's son. Even though conduct is described as "negligence" in complaint, conduct was intentional, when considering complaint as a whole. Insurer does not have duty to defendant other insured, as her alleged conduct was intentional, and policy does not contain self-defense exception for intentional acts. (KNECHT, concurring; POPE, concurring in part and dissenting in part.)