People v. Donath

Court's decision to deny Respondent's conditional release was not against manifest weight of evidence, as all three of State's experts concluded that he continued to be a sexually dangerous person, and it was more likely than not that he would reoffend if not confined. After 12 years in treatment, Respondent had not successfully addressed his sexual preoccuplation or core problem issues. Respondent was not denied right to speedy trial, as his remaining in custody for three years was not alone prejudicial, and he requested or agreed to most of the continuances. (WRIGHT and LYTTON, concurring.)