Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Contracts
Bank agreed to finance construction of $8.1 million athletic training facility. Defendant, who was a client of the athletic training company borrower, executed limited personal guaranty of certain loan, not to exceed $2 million. Terms of guaranty are not ambiguous, and thus resort to parol evidence is unnecessary, and consideration of extrinsic evidence would add to and materially change the guaranty as written. Any reliance on statements made by Defendant during course of contract negotiations that conflict with agreed-upon written terms of guaranty, which Bank drafted, were not a reasonable basis upon which to rely in making subsequent loan. (STERBA and HYMAN, concurring.)