People v. Dereadt

Defendant was convicted, by six-person jury, of disorderly conduct. Defense counsel stated that she had spoken with Defendant about whether he would want a jury of six and twelve, implying that Defendant actively participated in the decision. This was sufficient for Defendant's waiver of jury of twelve. Victims' failure to identify Defendant and his vehicle precisely did not render their identifications unreliable. (BURKE and HUTCHINSON, concurring.)