Plaintiff was shot in the leg during an altercation between two rival rap groups. Jury found Defendant guilty of attempted murder, aggravated battery with a firearm, aggravated discharge of a firearm, and unlawful possession of a weapon by a felon. Court did not abuse its discretion by declining to question potential jurors about their bias towards gangs and rap groups. Court also did not err by admitting other acts of violence that occurred between the groups. The evidence was relevant to establish a continuing narrative between the groups. Additionally, the evidence was sufficient to show Defendant fired the bullet that entered Plaintiff’s leg. The fact that others discharged a firearm does not mean evidence was insufficient to show Defendant, in particular, shot Plaintiff. Lastly, the fact that the bullet could safely remain in Plaintiff’s body does not preclude a finding that the shot caused “great bodily harm.” (HARRIS and APPLETON, concurring.)
Illinois Appellate Court
Criminal Court
Evidence; Voir Dire