Illinois Appellate Court
Criminal Court
Sexual Abuse
Defendant, age 23 with IQ of 48, having sustained brain injury at age 5, functions at level of a 3-year-old. Thus, court could not base its finding that Defendant knowingly acted for purpose of sexual gratification or arousal solely on nature contact. Evidence of nondescript school incident was insufficient to support expert's opinion. Evidence was insufficient to prove the Defendant was "not not guilty" of aggravated criminal sexual abuse and battery. (HUDSON and BIRKETT, concurring.)