Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Appellate Procedure
Court properly dismissed with prejudice pro se Plaintiff’s 4th amended complaint against his ex-wife, Ameritrade, and the attorneys and law firms that had represented Plaintiff or his ex-wife during dissolution proceedings. Appeal, which is Plaintiff’s 3rd appeal, dismissed because Plaintiff’s opening brief contains multiple violations of Supreme Court Rules 341 and 342, as did his 2 prior appeals. Violations include citations to volumes of record that are not part of record on appeal, appendix lacks table of contents and notice of appeal, and facts stated lack citation to record. (REYES and ROCHFORD, concurring.)