Dist.Ct. did not err in sentencing defendant to 57-month term of incarceration plus 3 years of supervised release on attempted robbery charge, even though defendant argued that two terms of supervised release were substantively unreasonable. Term that required that defendant refrain from using controlled substances and submit up to 104 drug tests per year of supervised release was reasonable in view of defendant’s 40 history of drug addiction, and Ct. rejected defendant’s contention that said term required up to 208 drug tests per year. Moreover, term that allowed probation officer to visit defendant at any “reasonable” time and at “reasonable” location specified by probation officer was consistent with Ct.’s decision in Henry, 813 F.3d 681.
