Dist. Ct. did not err in granting defendant-State’s motion for summary judgment in action alleging that Illinois Firearm Concealed Carry Act (Act) violated Second Amendment as applied to plaintiffs-out-of-state residents, where defendant refused to issue concealed carry licenses to plaintiffs, because they live in states that did not have substantially similar licensing standards to standards used by defendant for issuance of concealed carry licenses to in-state residents under said Act. Record showed that: (1) monitoring compliance of out-of-state residents is limited in material ways by defendant’s inability to obtain complete and timely information about nonresidents, especially concerning arrests for domestic violence or mental health commitments that occur after submission of license application; (2) Illinois cannot compel such information from other states or obtain said information from national databases; and (3) instant plaintiffs reside in states that do not have comparable concealed carry licensing standards. As such, said Act did not violate Second Amendment since Act’s approach to issue concealed carry licenses only to in-state residents and out-of-state residents who live in states that have substantially similar licensing requirements serves as adequate assurance that individuals licensed to carry firearms in public remain fit and qualified to do so. Ct. further rejected plaintiffs’ claim that said Act violated Privileges and Immunities Clause. (Dissent filed.)