Â
Defendant waived her challenge on appeal of Dis. Ct.'s imposition of condition of supervised release requiring that defendant maintain employment and or seek education during term of supervised release unless excused by probation officer, even though defendant asserted that said condition was unconstitutionally vague. Record showed that defendant did not object to any of proposed conditions of supervised release contained in presentence report, even though she filed objections to other aspects of presentence report. Moreover, defendant stated during sentencing hearing that she intended to obtain college degree during her sentence to acquire useful skills, and her counsel waived Dist. Ct.'s offer to read into record all of defendant’s conditions of supervised release and to justify said conditions. As such, waiver, as opposed to forfeiture of said issue, applied, since record showed that defendant made deliberate and informed decision not to challenge instant employment condition.