People v. Carter

Defendant was convicted, after bench trial, of being an armed habitual criminal (AHC). The Terry stop of Defendant was supported by requisite reasonable suspicion, and thus court properly denied Defendant's motion to suppress. Evidence was insufficient to establish Defendant's guilt of AHC. State's proof included no evidence that Defendant's aggravated battery resulted in great bodily harm or permanent disability or disfigurement. (A. BURKE, GARMAN, THEIS, OVERSTREET, and CARTER, concurring; NEVILLE, concurring in part and dissenting in part.)