Chicago White Sox, Ltd v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.

Appeal involving an insurance coverage dispute where the plaintiffs sought a determination that they were an “additional insurance” on a policy held by a company they had contracted with to do work on the plaintiff’s property. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the insurance company, finding that the plaintiff was not an additional insured. The appellate court affirmed, finding that the plaintiff was not an additional insured because there was no written agreement between the two companies that required the plaintiff to be named as an additional insured. (LAMPKIN and NAVARRO, concurring)