Dual Roles in Illinois Child-Welfare Proceedings: Detailed Analysis of In re E.L. and In re D.S.
By Pedram Hoss
Child Law,
May 2026
By focusing on In re E.L. and examining related cases, it is clear that Illinois courts approve dual representation when the attorney’s advocacy aligns with the child’s best interests and no concrete conflict exists. Courts and practitioners should continue to evaluate each case individually, ensuring that representation remains faithful to the child’s welfare and grounded in statutory authority and judicial precedent.
Spot an error in your article? Contact Celeste Niemann at cniemann@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article, visit the ISBA Newsletters page.
Select a Different Author
