Business Advice and Financial Planning

House Bill 4648

Topic: 
Fiduciary access to digital assets

(Welch, D-Westchester; Connelly, R-Lisle) creates the Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act (2015). This is a big bill for transactional and estate-planning lawyers, and it has an immediate effective date so that it becomes law if and when the Governor signs it. House Bill 4648 provides procedures and requirements for the access and control by guardians, executors, agents, and other fiduciaries of the digital assets of persons who are deceased, under a legal disability, or subject to the terms of a trust. Passed both chambers

Adams v. Employers Insurance Company of Wausau

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Corporations
Citation
Case Number: 
2016 IL App (3d) 150418
Decision Date: 
Thursday, February 18, 2016
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Peoria Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
McDADE

(Court opinion corrected 3/23/16.) Plaintiffs, diagnosed with mesothelioma and lung cancer, filed declaratory judgment complaint against defendant insurers.  Court properly dismissed complaint as barred by Section 12.80 of Business Corporation Act of 1983 which prohibits direct actions against insurers. Insured corporation, an insulation contractor that used asbestos products, was dissolved in 2003, and purchaser of certain of its assets did not buy any of its liabilities or liability insurance policies. Plaintiffs' causes of action did not accrue until after expiration of corporation's 5-year wind-up period, and they cannot sue corporation to obtain liability judgment against it.(HOLDRIDGE and WRIGHT, concurring.)

House Bill 4528

Topic: 
Tenants Radon Protection Act

(McAsey, D-Lockport) provides that before a lease is signed, a landlord must provide each tenant any records pertaining to radon concentrations within the dwelling unit that indicate a radon hazard. If a tenant performs a radon test, the tenant must provide to the landlord the test result within 10 days after receiving the result. Before a lease is signed a landlord must furnish each prospective tenant with a prescribed radon hazard disclosure form. Nothing implies an obligation on a landlord or tenant to conduct any radon testing. Provides that a lease may be terminated under specified circumstances involving radon hazard. Referred to House Rules Committee. 

House Bill 4648

Topic: 
Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act.

(Welch, D-Westchester) provides procedures and requirements for the access and control by guardians, executors, agents, and other fiduciaries of the digital assets of persons who are deceased, under a legal disability, or subject to the terms of a trust. Referred to House Rules Committee. 

House Bill 4491

Topic: 
Forcible entry and detainers and condos

(Drury, D-Highwood) amends this Article for actions for possession for unpaid condominium expenses. A unit owner may raise as defenses: (1) a material breach of any duty set forth in the Condominium Property Act, governing condominium instruments, rules and regulations, or any applicable statute or ordinance applicable to the unit owner’s possession of the condominium unit; or (2) an improper motive for bringing the action. It also bars an association from recovering any attorney’s fees and costs against a unit owner if the association is found by a court to have breached an obligation under this Article or the Condominium Property Act; or in the case of any member of the association’s board of managers, he or she is found to have breached a fiduciary duty to the unit owner or the association. Introduced and referred to House Rules Committee.

House Bill 4490

Topic: 
Condominium Property Act

(Drury, D-Highwood) allows an association to add to a unit owner’s part of the common expense for default of some duty (as required by statute, ordinance, or condominium instruments) but only if a court first awards the association its attorney fees. Repeals current law that automatically allows the association to add these fees in the unit owner’s share of the common expense. Introduced and referred to House Rules Committee. 

House Bill 4489

Topic: 
Condominium Property Act

(Drury, D-Highwood) makes a number of changes to this Act, which are as follows. (1) Contains a statement of public policy that a unit owner has the right to fairness in litigation or other legal action regardless whether the unit owner instigates it or the association does. (2) Allows a unit owner to bring a legal action against the association or its board of managers to enforce individual or common-interest community rights without being required to sue other homeowners or otherwise name them as defendants. Any cost to provide a notice to unit owners is to be paid by the association and may not be assessed against the unit owner bringing the action. (3) Voids as a matter of public policy any provision of any condominium instrument or any rule or regulation seeking to limit a unit owner’s right to commence litigation against an association or its board of managers or to limit the liability of an association or its board of managers for a breach of duty. (4) Provides that a unit owner’s compliance with an association’s demand does not waive the unit owner’s right or ability to challenge the demand in a legal action commenced later. (5) Requires a unit owner to be awarded reasonable attorney’s fees to enforce this Act (a) to the extent the unit owner prevails as a plaintiff; or (b) the unit owner as defendant prevails on any affirmative defense or counterclaim for a breach by the association or its board of managers for an obligation under this Act, condominium instruments, rules and regulations, or another applicable statute or ordinance. (6) Requires the association be awarded its reasonable attorney’s fees to enforce this Act but that the court may reduce the award or in part or entirely if: (a) the court finds that the legal action benefited the association by clarifying its duties; or (b) based on other equitable considerations. (7) Bars the association from recovering any attorney’s fees and costs in a claim brought under the Forcible Entry and Detainer Article of the Code of Civil Procedure if the unit owner prevails based on a breach of duty by the association or by any member of its board of managers. (8) Provides that in litigation, the association is required to represent the best interests of all unit owners and the association without regard to the wishes of the board of managers. (9) Provides that the association may not be represented in litigation by counsel who also represents the association’s board of managers either individually or collectively. Introduced and referred to House Rules Committee. 

Cook County ordinances 15-5775 and 15-5780

Topic: 
Filing fee increase
The Cook County Board has on its agenda two ordinances to increase litigants and defendants' filing fees from $15 to $25 for the court automation fee (15-5775) and from $15 to $25 for the document storage fee (15-5780). These fees are paid by civil litigants and defendants in felony, misdemeanor, municipal ordinance, conservation, and traffic cases (excluding minor traffic cases satisfied without a court appearance. These two ordinances will probably be voted the week of November 16th to take effect December 1, 2015.

Coe v. BDO Seidman, LLP

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Arbitration
Citation
Case Number: 
2015 IL App (1st) 142215
Decision Date: 
Monday, August 31, 2015
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 1st Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
HARRIS
Plaintiffs sued consulting company for its advice to use distressed debt strategy to offset ordinary income and/or capital gain upon receiving substantial sum from sale of private company. Court properly granted motion to stay action pending arbitration and motion for protective order limiting discovery pursuant to arbitration clause. Arbitration provision in consulting agreement includes provision explicitly stating that services provided include issuance of opinion as to federal income tax consequences of transactions, and Defendant accepts responsibility for opinion it will provide to client. Thus, Plaintiffs' claims fall within arbitration provision of agreement. Under New York law (which applies due to choice-of-law provision in agreement), discovery limitation does not render agreement unconscionable.(CUNNINGHAM and CONNORS, concurring.)