Commercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy

House Bill 25

Topic: 
Small Estate Affidavit
(Flowers, D-Chicago) and House Bill 162 (Chapia LaVia, D-Aurora) makes a number of changes to the Small Estate Affidavit statute. (1) Requires that the affidavit state that the burial and funeral expenses, medical bills, credit card bills, and real property taxes (instead of funeral expenses) have been or remain to be paid. (2) Makes a number of changes if there is a surviving spouse as follows. (a) If there is a surviving spouse, and the surviving spouse is unable to prepare the small estate affidavit or has declined to do so, the affiant must state the reason that the affiant has prepared the small estate affidavit rather than the surviving spouse. (b) If the reason for the surviving spouse's inability to prepare the affidavit is medically related, a letter from the surviving spouse's physician should be attached attesting to that effect. (c) If the surviving spouse is the affiant, he or she shall affirm that he or she was not separated from the decedent (3) If there is no surviving spouse and there is one or more minor children, the affiant must be a court-appointed guardian for one or more of the children. Referred to House Rules Committee.

Senate Bill 1746

Topic: 
New filing fee
(Trotter, D-Chicago; Harris, D-Chicago) creates a $10 fee to be paid by civil litigants who file an appearance and defendants who are convicted or plead guilty to any felony, misdemeanor, traffic, municipal, or conservation offense to pay for the Supreme Court E-Business Plan. The E-Business Plan is to develop and maintain an automated point-of-access case and statistics management system. It will will include applications for e-filing, e-guilty, and e-signatures as well as trial court and probation data exchanges. Senate Bill 1746 is scheduled for hearing in House Judiciary Committee on Sunday, Jan. 6, 2013.

Bank of America National Association v. Bassman FBT

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mortgage Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2012 IL App (2d) 110729
Decision Date: 
Monday, June 18, 2012
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Du Page Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
HUDSON
(Supplemental opinion on denial of rehearing 12/7/12.) Court properly granted summary judgment of foreclosure and sale. New York law applies, as contract's choice-of-law provision specifies that New York law governs the trust, and no aspect of pertinent New York law is contrary to Illinois public policy. Under New York law, Defendants have standing to attack transaction only if it is void, regardless of whether it was ratified. A trustee's ultra vires acts are not void but voidable. Pooling and services agreement (PSA), which gave Plaintiff authority to foreclose, manifests intent to limit rights under PSA to those who are parties to it, and Defendants are not third-party beneficiaries of PSA. (HUTCHINSON and ZENOFF, concurring.)

House Bill 3636

Topic: 
Mechanics Lien Act
(Burke, D-Evergreen Park; Mulroe, D-Chicago) does three things in response to the LaSalle Bank National Association vs. Cypress Creek opinion. (1) Requires that the owner or interested person’s demand for suit to be commenced or answered within 30 days must contain this language in at least 10-point, boldface type: “Failure to respond to this notice within 30 days after receipt, as required by Section 34 of the Mechanics Lien Act, shall result in the forfeiture of the referenced lien.” (2) Defines a “lien creditor” as someone who does work or furnishes material under this Act for improvements. A lien creditor is preferred over other encumbrances except that previous encumbrances are preferred only to the extent of the value of the land at the time the contract was made for the improvements, and each lien creditor is preferred to the value of all later improvements regardless of whether the lien creditor provided those improvements. (3) If the sale proceeds are insufficient to satisfy claims of both prior encumbrances and lien creditors, the sale proceeds are to be distributed as follows: (a) Any previous encumbrance has a paramount lien in the portion of the proceeds attributable to the value of the land at the time of making of the contract for improvements. (b) Any lien creditors have a paramount lien in the portion of the proceeds attributable to all later improvements made to the property. It has an immediate effective date. House Bill 3636 is in the House awaiting concurrence on Senate Amendment No. 2.

Senate Bill 16

Topic: 
Fast-track mortgage forecosure
(Collins, D-Chicago; Lyons, D-Chicago) creates an expedited judgment and sale procedure for abandoned residential property. An additional filing fee will be imposed on plaintiffs in a tiered system in which the fees increase in proportion to the number of foreclosures a plaintiff prosecutes. The fees will also pay for "housing counseling" for residents who are going through the foreclosure process in effort to help them save their homes. Clarifies that a portion of the Conveyances Act is permissive instead of mandatory to prevent that portion of the Act from affecting the validity of a properly recorded mortgage by a trustee in bankruptcy. House Amendment 8 becomes the bill and is positioned to move during this veto session.

Senate Bill 3180

Topic: 
Title Insurance Act
(Mulroe, D-Chicago; Lang, D-Skokie) carves out an exception to the prohibition against a title insurance company, title insurance agent, or independent escrowee making disbursements in connection with any escrows, settlements, or closings out of a fiduciary trust account or accounts. The exception that Senate Bill 3180 creates is if the funds are good funds and the title insurance company, title insurance agent, or independent escrowee and the financial institution are known to each other and agree to the use of these funds. Passed the Senate this spring and scheduled for a hearing Tuesday in House Executive Committee.

Gaylor v. Campion, Curran, Rausch, Gummerson and Dunlop, P.C.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Legal Malpractice
Citation
Case Number: 
2012 IL App (2d) 110718
Decision Date: 
Thursday, November 15, 2012
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
McHenry Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
ZENOFF
(Court opinion corrected 11/16/12.) Plaintiffs filed legal malpractice action related to business venture and patents; court dismissed common-law fraud count. Plaintiffs never actually filed an amended complaint that incorporated or referenced the previously dismissed fraud count, and thus they did not preserve the fraud count for de novo appellate review. Jury's damages award of $182,625 fell within the range supported by the evidence; jury reasonably could have concluded that Defendants' negligence did not proximately cause Plaintiffs to incur preclosing or postclosing expenses, or amount paid by Plaintiffs at closing. (BIRKETT, concurring; McLAREN, specially concurring.)

Yellow Book Sales & Distribution Co. v. Feldman

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Contracts
Citation
Case Number: 
2012 IL App (1st) 120069
Decision Date: 
Thursday, November 15, 2012
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 4th Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
FITZGERALD SMITH
(Court opinion corrected 11/21/12.) Plaintiff, an attorney, continued to sign advertising contracts with Yellow Book, even after he was placed on notice of personal collections suit against him (after his company went out of business and ceased paying its bills), and in so doing he did not attempt to cross out contract language as to personal guarantee or add language limiting his guarantee to his corporate role. Court properly found that Plaintiff intended to be bound personally under contract guarantee. (LAVIN and PUCINSKI, concurring.)

Church of the Little Flower v. US Bank

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Trusts
Citation
Case Number: 
2012 IL App (4th) 120266
Decision Date: 
Monday, November 5, 2012
District: 
4th Dist
Division/County: 
Sangamon Co.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Justice: 
COOK
Church petitioned court for reformation of a trust of which church is one of three remaining beneficiaries. Doctrine of equitable deviation did not apply, and thus reformation of trust was improper. Deviation, including termination, merely because it would be more advantageous to the beneficiaries, is inappropriate. Equitable deviation is proper only where trust is so inefficient that its continuation would necessarily interfere with the trust's purpose.(TURNER and KNECHT, concurring.)

Irvington Elevator Company v. Heser

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Contracts
Citation
Case Number: 
2012 IL App (5th) 110184
Decision Date: 
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
District: 
5th Dist.
Division/County: 
Marion Co.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
GoLDENHERSH
In breach of contract claim for grain contracts, parties' course of dealing is highly relevant; in numerous instances, oral contracts were honored though confirmations were sent months later, and many contracts could not be priced or performed for two years after oral agreement. Whether Plaintiff's confirmations were sent within a reasonable period of time is a question of fact, involving fact-intensive inquiry per UCC, including course of dealing and trade usage. (WELCH and CHAPMAN, concurring.)