Construction Law

Construction Law

M&S Industrial Co., Inc. v. Allahverdi

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Statutes of Limitations
Citation
Case Number: 
2018 IL App (1st) 172028
Decision Date: 
Sunday, August 26, 2018
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 4th Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
BURKE

(Court opinion corrected 12/19/18.) Court properly dismissed Plaintiff's complaint arising out of injuries sustained when roof of Defendant's building uplifted during a wind storm and struck nearby power lines, resulting in an electrical surge that damaged Plaintiff's property. Section 13-214(a) of Code of Civil Procedure, which is the construction negligence limitation period, applies to Plaintiff's claims, which involve a defectively constructed roof, a single event that does not entail daily provision of a dangerous utility to a customer.Limitations period was triggered at the time the roof of Defendant's building detached and caused damage to Plaintiff's property. As 4-year limitations period expired before Plaintiff filed suit, dismissal was proper.(McBRIDE and GORDON, concurring.)

Senate Bill 904

Topic: 
Workers Compensation Act

(Hastings, D-Tinley Park; Hoffman, D-Belleville) amends the Workers' Compensation Act affecting fees and electronic claims. (1) Requires a provider to bill an employer or its designee directly. (2) Provides that the employer or the insurer must send to the provider an explanation of benefits. (3) Requires employers and insurers to pay interest to providers at the rate of 1% per month for services rendered on and after the effective date of this amendatory Act if the bill is not paid promptly.

(4) Authorizes providers to bring an action in circuit court to enforce the payment procedures with regard to services rendered on and after the effective date of this amendatory Act. (5) Requires the Director of Insurance to adopt rules to ensure that providers have the opportunity to comply with requests for records by employers and insurers. (6) Imposes penalties upon employers and insurers that fail to comply with the electronic claims process. This bill was amendatorily vetoed by the Governor, and the Senate overrode his veto last week. The House may consider it next week. If both chambers override the veto, it takes effect immediately. 
 

House Bill 3452

Topic: 
Workers Compensation Act

(Soto, D-Chicago; Hastings, D-Tinley Park) amends the Workers Compensation Act so that takes effect if and only if Senate Bill 904 of the 100th General Assembly becomes law in the form in which it passed both houses on May 31, 2018. In provisions concerning required interest payments to providers for unpaid bills, requires such payments to be made by the employer or its insurer to the provider within 30 days (rather than not later than 30 days) after payment of the bill. Provides that if the employer or its insurer fails to pay interest within 30 days after payment of the bill, the provider may bring an action in circuit court for the sole purpose of seeking payment of interest against the employer or its insurer. Provides that the circuit court's jurisdiction shall be limited to enforcing payment of interest as required under a specified provision of the Act. Effective upon becoming law or on the date Senate Bill 904 of the 100th General Assembly takes effect, whichever is later. It is on the House concurrence calendar after passing the Senate. 
 

House Bill 200

Topic: 
Workers Compensation Act

(Hoffman, D-Belleville; Hastings, D-Tinley Park) amends the Workers Compensation Act to require an employer or insurer to provide written notification to a provider and employee (or a designee) an explanation of benefits that explains the basis for the denial of a work-related illness or injury or the insufficiency of the required data necessary to adjudicate a medical bill.  On the House concurrence calendar after passing the Senate last week.  

House Bill 5978

Topic: 
Bill of particulars

(Thapedi, D-Chicago) amends the Code of Civil Procedure. It provides that if the pleader does not file and serve a bill of particulars within 28 days of the demand, or if the bill of particulars delivered is insufficient, the court may, among other things, award attorney's fees and costs. Creates a 28-day deadline for moving that a demand for a bill of particulars be denied or modified. Just introduced. 
 

LB Steel, LLC v. Carlo Steel Corp.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Breach of Contract
Citation
Case Number: 
2018 IL App (1st) 153501
Decision Date: 
Friday, September 28, 2018
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 5th Div,
Holding: 
Dismissed in part; affirmed in part; judgment entered; remanded.
Justice: 
HOFFMAN

Consolidated cases involving a construction project at O'Hare Airport. Various judgments are affirmed, others, including judgment entered on claim for a lien against public funds, and on claim for quantum meruit, are reversed. As appellant committed the first material breach of contract, and other company withheld payment as allowed by contract, appellant was not entitled to recover on its breach of contract claim. As defective welds were a material breach of contract, the fact that they were just a portion of total welds performed by appellant does not show that breach was unsubstantial. Each of the setoffs imposed by court must be reversed, pursuant to Section 12-178 of Code of Civil Procedure. Claims arising from defective welding were expressly excluded from coverage under policy. (ROCHFORD and HALL, concurring.)

Public Act 100-1061

Topic: 
Mechanics Lien Act

(Ford, D-Chicago; Castro, D-Elgin) create a three-year pilot program that allows the recorder of deeds to establish an administrative law process to adjudicate expired mechanic’s liens that have been recorded but not litigated or released under the Mechanics Lien Act.

 

Effective January 1, 2019.

Public Act 100-1048

Topic: 
Summons and foreclosure

(Mulroe, D-Chicago; Martwick, D-Chicago) amends the Code of Civil Procedure to provide that the court’s jurisdiction is not affected by a technical error in format of a summons if the summons has been issued by a clerk of the court, the person or entity to be served is identified as a defendant on the summons, and the summons is properly served.

 

Actions for the recovery of real property following a foreclosure must be brought within two years after possession is taken. If a petition is filed to reopen a foreclosure proceeding, the purchaser or successor purchaser is entitled to remain in possession of the property until the foreclosure action is defeated or the previously foreclosed defendant redeems from the foreclosure sale if the purchaser has been in possession of the property for more than six months. A purchaser in actual possession of lands or tenements following a foreclosure is adjudged to be the legal owner of the lands or tenements if he or she continues in possession for two successive years and pays all taxes legally during that time.

 

Amends the Mortgage Rescue Fraud Act to provide that it is a violation for a distressed-property consultant to, among other things, enter into, enforce, or act upon any agreement with a foreclosure defendant, whether the foreclosure is completed or otherwise, if the agreement provides for a division of proceeds between the foreclosure defendant and the distressed-property consultant derived from the foreclosure litigation.

 

Effective August 23, 2018.