The One About Passing AI Costs Through to Clients
By Carolyn Elefant
Federal Taxation,
September 2026
The question presented in this inaugural MyShingle Ethics Opinion: May lawyers pass the costs of artificial intelligence, from subscriptions and platform licenses to metered per-token usage charges, through to clients, and should they? The view of this Opinion is that firms should absorb all AI-related costs as overhead subject to two narrow situations only: extraordinary single-matter consumption that functions like an outside vendor charge, and tools the client directs the lawyer to use.
Custom ChatGPTs: Navigating Legal and Ethical Compliance for Public-Facing AI Tools
By Carolyn Elefant
Rural Practice,
August 2026
Custom versions of ChatGPT for public use can raise legal and ethical considerations, including applications of these tools, ethical AI disclosure, attorney-client relationship, confidentiality, the unauthorized practice of law, and attorney supervision. While it is necessary to consider these factors, there are practical solutions you can implement to ensure compliance and protect both users and legal practitioners.
The One About Passing AI Costs Through to Clients
By Carolyn Elefant
Rural Practice,
July 2026
The question presented in this inaugural MyShingle Ethics Opinion: May lawyers pass the costs of artificial intelligence, from subscriptions and platform licenses to metered per-token usage charges, through to clients, and should they? The view of this Opinion is that firms should absorb all AI-related costs as overhead subject to two narrow situations only: extraordinary single-matter consumption that functions like an outside vendor charge, and tools the client directs the lawyer to use.
What Those People Selling Generic Prompts and Skills Aren’t Telling You About Copyright
By Carolyn Elefant
Rural Practice,
June 2026
As a general rule, only work created by humans qualify for copyright protection. Prompts alone resulting in AI-generated product don’t give humans enough control over the output to claim copyright. In other words, you’re telling the AI what you want, but you’re not controlling how it expresses that idea. The AI is. Thus, if you are using AI for marketing content for your firm, it may not be protected.
Custom ChatGPTs: Navigating Legal and Ethical Compliance for Public-Facing AI Tools
By Carolyn Elefant
Agricultural Law,
April 2026
Custom versions of ChatGPT for public use can raise legal and ethical considerations, including applications of these tools, ethical AI disclosure, attorney-client relationship, confidentiality, the unauthorized practice of law, and attorney supervision. While it is necessary to consider these factors, there are practical solutions you can implement to ensure compliance and protect both users and legal practitioners.
My Experience Comparing Lexis and ChatGPT Deep Research
By Carolyn Elefant
Rural Practice,
February 2026
As artificial intelligence develops, classic legal tools, like Westlaw and Lexis, may become less useful. In comparison to Lexis, ChatGPT Deep Research has valuable tools that could improve efficiency in your legal practice.
My Experience Comparing Lexis and ChatGPT Deep Research
By Carolyn Elefant
Agricultural Law,
November 2025
As artificial intelligence develops, classic legal tools, like Westlaw and Lexis, may become less useful. In comparison to Lexis, ChatGPT Deep Research has valuable tools that could improve efficiency in your legal practice.
Spot an error in your article? Contact Celeste Niemann at cniemann@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article, visit the ISBA Newsletters page.
Select a Different Author