Intellectual Improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, June 2014Eclectic selective summaries of IP agency changes, IP cases, noteworthy events, and curiosities.
Creatives, entrepreneurs, and startupsBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, May 2014While Creatives, Entrepreneurs, and Startups follow unique paths, there typically are a few major pitfalls to minimize. Here are 19 brief guidelines; some are helpful reminders for established endeavors.
Intellectual Improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, May 2014Eclectic selective summaries of IP agency changes, IP cases, noteworthy events, and curiosities.
Intellectual Improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, February 2014Eclectic selective summaries of IP agency changes, IP cases, noteworthy events, and curiosities.
Surveys, science & skepticismBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, February 2014Expert witnesses are used in diverse areas of the law, including intellectual property, and are typically paid for their work, as attorneys commonly are. A skilled expert may find consistent employment helping fact finders understand the evidence and implied facts.
Breaches of privacy and data—New risks, new insuranceBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, October 2013The Internet makes everything much easier, including breaches of privacy and data. Federal and state laws now create employer and data-custodian liability for such breaches. An information audit is suggested. Insurance targeted for these liabilities is now available.
Intellectual Improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, October 2013Brief summaries or comments on interesting or important IP developments.
Intellectual Improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, December 2012Eclectic snippets from recent events. PTO warns of insolicitous solicitations; INTA launches teen ed UnrealCampaign.com; ND CA issues ESI Guidelines; FTC recommends truth telling; Academia IP; Ars Gratia Artis; EU; etc.
Intellectual improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, September 2012Short summaries and comments on recent IP cases, Government requests for comment, and other notices.
Intellectual improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, June 2012An eclectic gathering of recent intellectual property news and cases.
PTO notesBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, March 2012News updates regarding the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office.
Trademark scam warningBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, March 2012Be aware that private companies not associated with the United States Patent and Trademark Office often use trademark application and registration information from the USPTO’s databases to mail or e-mail trademark-related solicitations.
PTO focuses on feedbackBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, December 2011While the dedicated attention and oft’ times quick responses of Craig Morris and his team at the PTO are making communicating with the Trademark Office much more efficient, it still requires an experienced trademark professional to know the meaning of the diverse electronic choices and to efficiently evaluate how to respond to the non-automated examiners’ office actions.
Intellectual Improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, June 2011News updates affecting intellectual property attorneys.
Winning chances? Client relations, math, and ethicsBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, June 2011Clients and others often ask attorneys for the chances of winning a dispute. Attorneys often answer, but they should not. Mathematically the wrong question is asked; numerical answers likely violate legal ethics by incompetently providing incorrect and often deceptive information. A better response provides both valid case evaluation and client emotional support without fabricating false certainty.
Intellectual Improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, April 2011News updates affecting intellectual property attorneys.
Copyright noticesBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, December 2010Copyright Office Notices.
Discovering Electronically Stored Information (ESI): Self-Reliance and FRCivP 26*By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, December 2010Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 (b)(2)(B) now requires an early conference among attorneys to discuss and plan discovery, including Electronically Stored Information (ESI). Attorneys cannot simply delegate to clients or commercial services the responsibility of understanding ESI and ESI discovery planning. The attorney has a non- delegable responsibility to know, not only traditional discovery relevance but also enough about email, computers, file archiving, the client’s business, and human nature to competently supervise others. This article presents an efficient procedure for self-reliant attorneys and firms to successfully manage the ESI discovery process. Guidelines are presented for both Macintosh and Windows computers.
Intellectual Improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, December 2010Sad Sap $1.65b verdict favoring Oracle for admitted copyright liability. Judge should refer even clearly meritless mandamus writ when his spouse is on defendant's board (In re Specht, trademark suit). Baha'i organizational divorce 40 years later, where's the contempt. Judge Posner clarifies "exceptional Lanham Act cases."
Dangerous delusions: Do it yourself, or don’tBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, November 2009Many once-arcane intellectual property (IP) procedures are now accessible to lay businesspersons and citizens.
Intellectual improbabilitiesBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, September 2009Recent updates in Intellectual Property law.
Spot an error in your article? Contact Celeste Niemann at cniemann@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article, visit the ISBA Newsletters page.